Naomi Osaka vs Talia Gibson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Jun at 06:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Osaka vs T. Gibson

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Osaka 1 - 0 Gibson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naomi Osaka winning 2 and Talia Gibson winning 0. The last match between Naomi Osaka and Talia Gibson was at the Wimbledon - London, 30-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Naomi Osaka getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Osaka | 1 |
| Gibson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Wimbledon - London(06-30-25)
N. Osaka vs T. Gibson H2H Profile
N. Osaka vs T. Gibson Match Preview:
- Osaka's recent second serve success is better than Gibson's, with a win rate of 46.01% compared to 41.42%. This is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
- For return games, both players show similar performance against opponents' second serves, with Osaka at 50.6% and Gibson at 50.59%.
- Gibson outshines Osaka in returning first serves, winning 31.06% compared to Osaka's 25.39%. Could this be a deciding factor?
- Under pressure, Osaka excels in saving breakpoints with a rate of 53.74%, while Gibson manages 46.93%.
- Although Gibson boasts a higher win percentage in the last year (66.67% vs. 62.5%), the event level needs consideration.
- Both players have their best win percentages on Hard courts at 66%.
- Osaka frequently competes at the Masters level with a 61.11% win rate, while Gibson shines in Challenger/ITF events with 69.64%.
- Osaka faces tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 76.58, whereas Gibson's opponents average 288.99. Does this skew head-to-head comparisons?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Gibson holds a slight edge with a 73% win rate over Osaka's 63%.
- When it comes to converting breakpoints, Gibson leads with a conversion rate of 39.67% compared to Osaka's 30.6%.
Editorial Prediction (June 30, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match, Osaka appears to have an edge in second serve performance and playing under pressure. She dominates in facing higher-ranked opponents, which might play to her advantage against Gibson.
Gibson's stronger first serve return and breakpoint conversion rates present significant factors in giving her a competitive edge. However, the level of competition she typically faces may not be on par with Osaka's usual adversaries.
Though Gibson shows a higher rate in deciding sets, Osaka's overall experience at elite tournaments might provide her with the necessary tools to overcome challenges.
In light of these considerations, Osaka is projected to be the likely victor in this matchup, thanks to her robust performance metrics against higher-tier opposition.
Naomi Osaka vs Talia Gibson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Osaka vs T. Gibson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:0 | Average Match Time | 1:35:0 |
| 60% (46/77) | 1st Serve % | 73% (48/66) |
| 78% (36/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (22/48) |
| 35% (11/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (11/18) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (33/66) | Return Points Win % | 39% (30/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Osaka Recent Matches Played
T. Gibson Recent Matches Played

N. Osaka vs T. Gibson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.46% (341/188) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.12% (178/104) |
| 61.06% (740/472) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.52% (406/254) |
| 54.72% (6143/5084) | Games Win/Loss | 54.40% (3333/2794) |
| 66.95% (233/115) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.61% (145/76) |
| 60.00% (66/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 66.67% (18/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (18/12) |
| 54.55% (24/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (12/12) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2348 | Aces Total | 919 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 998 | Total Double Faults | 956 |
| 1:9:32 | Average Match Time | 1:37:18 |
| 378.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.63 |
| 56% (15317/27213) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12205/18973) |
| 72% (10996/15317) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (8037/12205) |
| 48% (5753/11895) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3220/6767) |
| 46% (1395/3045) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1067/2339) |
| 43% (11585/27178) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8671/19327) |
| 72.28% (73/28) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 62.76% (91/54) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 75.00% (6/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.29% (83/57) | Main Tour W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 65.79% (75/39) | Challenger W/L | 63.72% (137/78) |
| 61.90% (13/8) | Futures W/L | 85.71% (24/4) |
| 65% (338/517) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (176/280) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (65/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (45/74) |
| 64% (104/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (44/94) |
| 90% (319/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (180/154) |
| 10% (319/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (180/26) |
| 26% (210/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (102/24) |